unapproved comments by CNN

Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to · an hour ago Unapproved if you are a business owner with a license you have been granted to do business with the public, for about half a century that has not been the case in the U.S. Discussion on CNN · 51884 comments Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to · an hour ago Unapproved you forget, every human has a sexual orientation. doesn't matter your skin pigment, culture, gender, economic class, hair color.... and there are gays and lesbians within all those other aspects of identity. so there were definitely gay and lesbian slaves. this isn't the pain and oppression olympics Discussion on CNN · 51884 comments Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to an hour ago Unapproved this law is meant to allow christians to do ignore nondiscrimination laws simply by saying that they are "prevented from using the person's property in a manner that the person finds satisfactory to fulfill the person's religious mission" again, churches are not part of this bill, as they are already covered. this is to allow members of churches to pretend their secular open to the gengeral public business is a church Discussion on CNN · 51884 comments Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to · an hour ago Unapproved it most certainly does do that. that is the intent of the law. ignorance of reality doesn't change it Discussion on CNN · 51884 comments Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to · 2 hours ago Unapproved the word trivial refers to infractions, not the type of service. it does not limit the type of service that can be denied, nor does it prevent infractions Discussion on CNN · 51884 comments Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to · 2 hours ago Unapproved the only thing that is needed to prove substantial burden is "that a person is prevented from using the person's property in a manner that the person finds satisfactory to fulfill the person's religious mission" would be pretty hard to prove that a person actually did find the transaction to satisfactorily fullfil the person's religious mission. notice, it is left up to the person to define what their religious mission is. this really is as bad as people are saying. Discussion on CNN · 51884 comments Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to · 2 hours ago Unapproved that a person is prevented from using the person's property in a manner that the person finds satisfactory to fulfill the person's religious mission. Discussion on CNN · 51884 comments Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to · 2 hours ago Unapproved the words trivial , technical or de minimis refer to infractions, not the type of service being denied. with the definition of undue burden having the extremely subjective and low bar of "Unreasonable burden" is " that a person is prevented from using the person's property in a manner that the person finds satisfactory to fulfill the person's religious mission" since most folks i have heard supporting this are of the mind that part of their religious mission is ridding the world of homosexuals so god won't smite the united states, i don't expect it to be too long before this ill considered piece of garbage is struck down. Discussion on CNN · 51884 comments Arizona passes controversial anti-gay bill Sue Jeffers You replied to · 2 hours ago Unapproved perhaps because it is not an "alternative lifestyle" , it is a sexual orientation. it is a fact of life. human beings have sexual orientations and lives. what is it that you think you are disagreeing with? because the words you used suggest you are attempting to disagree with the existence of gay, lesbian and bi human beings. kind of like disagreeing with left-handedness or blue eyes.